I have 60 top level assemblies and I created wt part for the same. Now I need all 60 wt part to be converted as End Items. Can I do this in Windchill or should I remove association of all wt, delete wt's, create End item wt and then associate it again with respective assemblies?
↧
Converting WT file as End Item WT
↧
Error while creating a part when Security Labels are configured
Hi,
I had configured Security Labels in my system. The method server is ready whenever i start and it doesn't crash. However few errors are being shown. PFB text of those errors.
ERROR [main] wt.access.configuration.SecurityLabelsHandler - The UFID 'cn=Agreement Managers,ou=people,cn=AdministrativeLdap,cn=Windchill_10.2,o=xyz|Ldap.corp.xyz.com|Ldap.corp.xyz.com' is invalid.
ERROR [main] wt.access.configuration.SecurityLabelsHandler - The UFID 'cn=US Persons,cn=Public,ou=people,cn=AdministrativeLdap,cn=Windchill_10.2,o=xyz|Ldap.corp.xyz.com|Ldap.corp.xyz.com' is invalid.
ERROR [main] wt.access.configuration.SecurityLabelsHandler - The UFID 'cn=US Persons,cn=Public,ou=people,cn=AdministrativeLdap,cn=Windchill_10.2,o=xyz|Ldap.corp.xyz.com|Ldap.corp.xyz.com' is invalid.
ERROR [main] wt.access.configuration.SecurityLabelsHandler - The UFID 'cn=US Persons,cn=Public,ou=people,cn=AdministrativeLdap,cn=Windchill_10.2,o=xyz|Ldap.corp.xyz.com|Ldap.corp.xyz.com' is invalid.
ERROR [main] wt.access.configuration.SecurityLabelsHandler - There are non-fatal syntax errors in the security labels configuration file.
Please refer to the Method Server log file for details.
.
.
.
.
.
ERROR [main] wt.access.agreement.StandardAgreementService - configureAgreementService: The group defining the agreement managers was not set properly in the Security Labels configuration file. This has the effect disabling the agreements UI and prevents write access to agreements for all users, including administrators. Existing agreements will still be evaluated during access checks.
and then the method server gets ready.
However when i navigate to a Product and then create a part i am able to create the part successfully but i am not able to view the part created in the product folders. An error is being reported in the Method Server Log like
ERROR [ajp-bio-8010-exec-1] wt.access.evaluation.report wcadmin - "Administrator" does not have Read permission for "Part - 0000000003, ABC, A.1 (Design)" in Administrative Domain "Site, Organization - Demo Organization, Product - GOLF_CART /Default".
ERROR [ajp-bio-8010-exec-1] com.ptc.mvc.controllers.ExceptionController wcadmin - message : You do not have access to this object or it does not exist.
error:-------------javax.servlet.ServletException: wt.util.WTException: You do not have access to this object or it does not exist.
javax.servlet.ServletException: wt.util.WTException: You do not have access to this object or it does not exist.
.
.
.
.
Caused by: wt.util.WTException: You do not have access to this object or it does not exist.
at com.ptc.windchill.enterprise.navigation.RedirectUtility.redirectToNewAction(RedirectUtility.java:240)
at com.ptc.windchill.enterprise.navigation.RedirectUtility.redirectToNewAction(RedirectUtility.java:171)
at com.ptc.jca.mvc.components.TypeBasedRedirector.handleGetContextObjectException(TypeBasedRedirector.java:86)
... 39 more
ERROR [ajp-bio-8010-exec-1] wt.servlet.ServletRequestMonitor.request wcadmin - 2017-02-17 16:22:03.992 +0530, 2uuz52;iz9owcyi;7852;uxo3jz;2039, wcadmin, 10.76.51.102, /Windchill/ptc1/tcomp/infoPage, oid=VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A138806&portlet=component, POST, 501, 0.0624004, 0.097618893
ERROR [ajp-bio-8010-exec-1] wt.access.evaluation.report wcadmin- "Administrator" does not have Read permission for "Part - 0000000003, ABC, A.1 (Design)" in Administrative Domain "Site, Organization - Demo Organization, Product - GOLF_CART /Default".
ERROR [ajp-bio-8010-exec-1] com.ptc.mvc.controllers.ExceptionController wcadmin - message : ATTENTION: Secured Action. You do not have the necessary authorization for this operation. Contact your administrator if you believe you have received this message in error.
error:-------------wt.util.WTRuntimeException: ATTENTION: Secured Action. You do not have the necessary authorization for this operation. Contact your administrator if you believe you have received this message in error.
All these operations were performed in Site itself. Can you please let me know how to debug this error.
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Achanta
↧
↧
How to create an Agreement
Hi.
Within Security Labels Configuration file I included a tag for Agreement Configuration.
AgreementConfiguration enabled="true">
<AgreementManagersGroup>
<groupUfid>cn=Agreement Managers,ou=people,cn=AdministrativeLdap,cn=Windchill_10.2,o=xyz|Ldap.corp.xyz.com|Ldap.corp.xyz.com</groupUfid>
</AgreementManagersGroup>
I then created a group called as Agreement Managers in Site Utilities and then added a user to that group.
However when i login with that user i am not able to find any icon to create a new agreement ? Can you please let me know if my process is right ? If not can you please let me know how to create the same ?
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Achanta
↧
Filter End item (and related parts) from Promotion request collection
When doing a promotion request of a End item WT part in Windchill, is there a way to filter the other end items that are in the same BOM (along with their related components) from the collection?
As an example, I have the two following assemblies:
END ITEM 1, which contains:
PART 1
END ITEM 2
END ITEM 2, which contains:
PART2
Is it possible to create a promotion request for END ITEM 1 which doesn't automatically collect END ITEM 2 and its components (in this case, PART 2)
Thank you
↧
How to create a custom Business rule
Hello can anyone please help me how to create a custom business rule does any one have any sample example
↧
↧
Windchill with docker ?
Hello,
I would like to know if anybody tried to use Windchill with docker containers?
I saw last year PTC event in Boston that R&D is thinking about it, but did not get any feedback yet.
Today we are using a lot of VM for developers and tests systems.
Painful part with VM is that if I want to be sure that all VM are up2date with OS patches, Oracle patches, Windchill content ... I need to ask all people to checkout the new VM every month.
The idea will be to create docker containers, probably 8, like that :
This will allow me to distribute OS update, Oracle update, new windchill content through Oracle datafiles update easily.
People will just have to update their dependencies and the update will be invisible for them.
Any idea, comment is welcomed.
Thanks,
Morgan
↧
Need some inputs on testing(both Manual and Automation) for Windchill
Hi All,
I have just got a scenario like if there is huge amount of data got migrated from a Non Windchill system or from a legacy Windchill system to Windchill 10.2 M030.
If huge amounts of data got migrated or loaded into the target system how are we going to check if the data got migrated or loaded properly ? Is it through manual testing or an automated testing or is there any other way to check the data ?
If there are any tools regarding the same can you please let me know like which tool is used and how do we use the same ?
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Achanta
↧
Deployment planning checklist
Where do I find the Windchill Deployment Planning Checklist?
↧
Publish Additional file DXF under parameter condition
Dear All
I need to understand if is possible enable the worker to publish also the DXF format for the Drawing but only under parameter condition.
My idea is define a boolen parameters on EPM Document like DXF_Publish TRUE/FALSE and the make the system
able to publish r DXF file if the above parameter was set TRUE.
Thanks to everybody have the solution
Beniamino
↧
↧
Windchill 10.2 packaging
Hi folks,
We have Windchill instance hosted in the United States and 5 global replicas scattered throughout the world. We are trying to get ODMs in Asia to adopt more typical usage using Creo / Windchill within the workspace but performance in some areas is very lack luster. Even with regional / local replicas in place, the 250+ latency back to master combined with the ODMs own network challenges make Creo usage in a integrated workspace challenging and time consuming. It seems PTC will not support a multi-master setup which leaves me wondering about further options. So, plan B.
How many of you use Windchill packaging? Creo packing? Are there any good presentations about how to set this up, what the pitfalls are, etc? I think at this point I would like to do a proof of concept with select ODMs to see if packaging would be a better offline / working solution.
thoughts / anything to share?
Jon
↧
Recovery of the accidentally deleted workspace from wind-chill
Is there any possible way to recover an accidentally deleted workspace from wind-chill which includes only new parts (not uploaded)? please suggest if any. I have used the recovery tool wherein I could able to retrieve the assembly but no parts within that.
thanks,
Dinesh G
↧
windchill customization help
I'm new to windchill customization . Currenly working on windchill 10.1 .I've just learnt to create actions . Now i would like to know about creating a attribute panel configuration. As in creating an action . upon clicking it i want to display certain details . adding groups in panel etc.
can anyone help?
↧
creo 4.0 will be compatible with PDM Essentials ( PDMLink 10.2 M030-CPS20) ?
creo 4.0 will be compatible with PDM Essentials ( PDMLink 10.2 M030-CPS20)
or PDM necessity upgrade ?
Thanks
↧
↧
How to create a custom Business rule
Hello can anyone please help me how to create a custom business rule does any one have any sample example
↧
Latest files
We had a situation recently where we didn't get what we expected when downloading from Windchill to a workspace.
The designer had saved the drawing and assembly file as part of a check-in process. Submitted a promotion request, which was rejected from a bad WTpart EBOM listing. Designer checked out the part and WTpart, made the corrections, checked them back in. Submitted a new promotion request against the drawing, which uses the Load latest rule, and the part/drawing are approved and released. However, the drawing file is pointing to an older version of the assembly and not the latest after the EBOM change. Come forward a few weeks and we go to put the files out to manufacturing, so Add to Workpace is used and low and behold we do not have the latest version model. Nothing was physically changed in the model, so that is ok.
The question being asked is: Is there a way at promotion request time to flag the promoter that the drawing is not utilizing the latest model, even though the latest model has been added to the promotion request because of the Load Latest rule? I do not think we want to modify the promotion request to use As Stored, since that could miss things at multiple levels.
Windchill 10.0 m40
Creo 2.0 m220
↧
Windchill Bulk Migrator 4.0 Discussion Page
Hello Everybody,
Welcome to the Windchill Bulk Migrator 4.0 Discussion Page. Feel free to talk, ask questions, share your experiences on the Windchill Bulk Migrator topic. Also, news and updates on this subject will be posted here as well.
Enjoy!
↧
Options & Variants
Friends,
Any presentations available for understanding Options & Variant Capabilities of Windchill (10.1 / 10.2)?
Thanks,
Ravin Kayasth
↧
↧
How to drive Quantity of an item in a BOM based on Options & Variants rules?
Hi,
With Options & Variants capability in windchill 9.1, how we can build the rules (Parameters, expressions, constraints, case tables, etc.,) to drive the quantity of an item under an Advanced Configurable Part?
Example:
Consider below BOM:
Top_Part (Adv Config Part)
Part1 (for option1) Qty - 1
Part2 (for option2) Qty - 2
Part3 (for both options) Qty - 2 Meters for Option1 and 5 Meters for Option2
While configuring, selecting option1 should result in:
Top_Part
Part1 Qty - 1
Part3 Qty - 2 Meters
Selecting option2 should result in:
Top_Part
Part2 Qty - 2
Part3 Qty - 5 Meters
Can you please help in this?
Thanks,
Prabhakaran V.
↧
Table View Creation/Customization under Checkin module do not have "Set Filter" option. Need it badly to control the object list.
Hello,
I am trying to create a New Table View under Check-in object list window to add few filters and cleanup few columns as per my needs. But Table View Creation/Customization under Check-in module do not have "Set Filter" option. Need it badly to control the object list.
Can someone help me on this. I might be missing something or it could be any setting changes on the PDMLink side. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abhishek MR
↧
What process do people use to grant access to Product areas?
Just polling to see what other companies do. We are looking to create somewhere where uses can request access to Products and have that routed to a certain role within the product (like a Product Manager). Sharepoint has a feature that if you are denied access, there is a button to email the owner and request access. Something similar to that or a process where by you can request access for multiple people (list). Our posture is to grant access only on a need to know basis. Does your company have this rolled into PDMLink or have you created an outside process to manage requests?
↧